A leadership tussle appears to be brewing within the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Ogun State, as the party’s state chapter firmly rejected the existence of a controversial “Apex Committee,” reaffirming that only structures recognized by the national leadership remain valid.

Addressing journalists, the Ogun State Chairman, Femi Soluade, maintained that the ongoing screening of aspirants is being conducted exclusively by the party’s duly constituted National Screening Committee. He emphasized that the process aligns strictly with established guidelines and reflects the party’s commitment to due process ahead of its forthcoming congresses.

The National Screening Committee, led by Austin, is currently in the state overseeing preparations—an exercise the state executive described as a clear indication of organizational discipline and coordination.

Soluade, alongside members of the State Working Committee, issued a stern warning against any parallel structures or unauthorized gatherings, stressing that activities conducted outside the officially designated party secretariat would be deemed invalid.

The clarification follows concerns over a group allegedly operating under the banner of an “Apex Committee,” reportedly set up by Dimeji Fabiyi. The party leadership categorically distanced itself from Fabiyi, noting that he is not a recognized member of the party’s National Executive Committee and therefore lacks the authority to establish any such body.

Describing the purported committee as illegitimate, the leadership declared that any decisions emanating from it are “null and void,” reinforcing its stance on maintaining internal order and party discipline.

Despite the internal friction, the Ogun ADC leadership expressed confidence in its preparedness to deliver a credible and transparent congress, assuring members of unity and alignment with the national body. It also urged aspirants and delegates to remain calm and committed to a peaceful process.

The development highlights ongoing internal power dynamics within party structures at the state level, with implications for cohesion and credibility as political parties position themselves ahead of future electoral cycles.